Table of Contents
Highlights and Lowlights for Campus Rights in 2014

PHILADELPHIA, December 29, 2014鈥擣or reasons both good and ill, 2014 will enter the history books as a major year for free speech, due process, and individual rights at our nation鈥檚 colleges and universities. The Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (蜜桃直播) won more meaningful victories for student and faculty rights than ever before and even published a book, , addressing new attacks on campus freedom and their causes. But opponents of those rights also found powerful new allies in the federal Departments of Education and Justice, driven by the explosive issue of sexual assault on campus.
鈥淭here鈥檚 no denying that 2014鈥斆厶抑辈モ檚 15th anniversary year鈥攈as been quite a year,鈥 said 蜜桃直播 President Greg Lukianoff. 鈥淲e鈥檙e confident that 蜜桃直播鈥檚 defense of free speech and due process on campus will ultimately be successful, because these are timeless and fundamental American values. 蜜桃直播 exists to vigorously defend individual rights from those who have convinced themselves that abandoning them is a quick and easy solution to the problems of the day.鈥
Highlights for campus rights in 2014 include:
- FIRE publicly launched its in July, coordinating the filing of four lawsuits on launch day and setting the goal of ending unconstitutional speech codes on public campuses for good. So far, 蜜桃直播 has coordinated the filing of seven First Amendment lawsuits challenging speech codes. Three have already been settled in favor of students鈥 free speech rights, at Citrus College and Modesto Junior College in California, and at the University of Hawaii at Hilo. Four other cases, at Western Michigan University, Chicago State University, Iowa State University, and Ohio University, are proceeding鈥攁nd more cases are on the way.
- The University of Florida, Georgetown College (Ky.), and Plymouth State University all worked with 蜜桃直播 to eliminate all of their speech codes, joining an elite group of only 19 schools in the nation that receive a 鈥済reen light鈥 rating in 蜜桃直播鈥檚 Spotlight speech codes database, meaning their written policies fully protect student speech.
- With 蜜桃直播鈥檚 help, lawmakers in Virginia enacted a law ensuring that students at Virginia鈥檚 public institutions of higher education will not be limited to expressing themselves in tiny 鈥渇ree speech zones鈥 or subjected to unreasonable registration requirements for speaking out. 蜜桃直播 will push similar legislation in a number of other states in 2015.
Free speech and due process lowlights of 2014 include:
- 鈥Disinvitation season鈥 returned to campuses, as notable speakers such as former Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, International Monetary Fund chief Christine Lagarde, and women鈥檚 rights activist and critic of Islam Ayaan Hirsi Ali were either disinvited from or pressured out of giving commencement speeches at American universities. While such disinvitations happen year-round, this spring鈥檚 bout of intolerance shocked many Americans who did not realize how unfriendly to dissent and diverse ideas some colleges鈥攁nd some students鈥攈ave become.
- Pennsylvania State University, the University of Connecticut, and Georgia Southern University, among other institutions, adopted unconstitutional speech codes thanks to a 鈥blueprint鈥 for such policies issued last year by the federal Departments of Education and Justice. 蜜桃直播 warned at the time that the so-called 鈥渂lueprint,鈥 issued as part of a settlement with the University of Montana, effectively mandated unconstitutional speech codes under the guise of Title IX compliance. 蜜桃直播 sounded the alarm, and while the Department of Education backed away from calling the settlement a 鈥渂lueprint鈥 in a letter to 蜜桃直播, we warned that without a notice to all colleges that the settlement was no longer a blueprint, colleges would adopt it anyway鈥攁nd that appears to be happening.
- California鈥檚 Law 鈥affirmative consent鈥 for sexual activity on campus made a mockery of due process by turning a great deal of lawful sexual activity into 鈥渟exual assault鈥 in campus courts鈥攁nd it has spread to university systems across the country. Presented as an antidote for sexual assault on campus, such rules effectively shift the burden of proof in campus rape accusations to the accused. The cavalier attitude towards this recipe for injustice is exemplified by one of the California law鈥檚 co-sponsors who, when asked how the accused could prove that he or she had received the required consent, replied: 鈥Your guess is as good as mine.鈥
鈥溍厶抑辈 hopes 2015 will bring greater clarity in the area of campus rights, and that courts and legislatures will strike back against the worst abuses of 2014,鈥 said 蜜桃直播 Senior Vice President Robert Shibley. 鈥淲e鈥檙e looking forward to working with students, faculty, administrators, and legislators to advance the cause of campus freedom in 2015.鈥

FIRE is a nonprofit educational foundation that unites civil rights and civil liberties leaders, scholars, journalists, and public intellectuals from across the political and ideological spectrum on behalf of individual rights, freedom of expression, academic freedom, due process, and rights of conscience at our nation鈥檚 colleges and universities. 蜜桃直播鈥檚 efforts to preserve liberty on campuses across America can be viewed at thefire.org.
CONTACT:
Robert Shibley, Senior Vice President, 蜜桃直播: 215-717-3473; robert@thefire.org
Recent Articles
FIRE鈥檚 award-winning Newsdesk covers the free speech news you need to stay informed.

Detaining 脰zt眉rk over an op-ed is unlawful and un-American

VICTORY! Tenn. town buries unconstitutional ordinance used to punish holiday skeleton display

For the rich, free speech 鈥 for others, a SLAPP in the face
